Open Steps |
Open Steps, release 1.0Report of a thinktank meeting on Free/Libre/Open Source Software in the health and health informatics domainsMarwell, February 2004 |
Appendices
5. Drivers and barriers around selected scenario
The groups generated a large number of drivers and barriers. After discussion of what seemed to be the more common drivers and barriers arising from the group discussions, a selection of these were used for voting; the results are presented below. In addition, the latter part of this section summarises some of the wider diversity of opinion on issues around drivers and barriers.
How strong do you think need for new business model is a barrier for our scenario
1. Very Strong 12%
2. Strong 42%
3. Moderate 31%
4. Weak 15%
5. Very Weak 0%
How strong do you think right standards is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 48%
2. Strong 32%
3. Moderate 20%
4. Weak 0%
5. Very Weak 0%
How strong do you think fitting trends towards internet services is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 12%
2. Strong 31%
3. Moderate 35%
4. Weak 19%
5. Very Weak 4%
How strong do you think the idea of only key personnel needing convincing is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 23%
2. Strong 27%
3. Moderate 15%
4. Weak 23%
5. Very Weak 12%
How strong do you think that transparency of public procurement is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 19%
2. Strong 46%
3. Moderate 19%
4. Weak 15%
5. Very Weak 0%
How strong do you think a fear of private profit is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 8%
2. Strong 31%
3. Moderate 23%
4. Weak 27%
5. Very Weak 11%
How strong do you think a political mandate is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 38%
2. Strong 42%
3. Moderate 8%
4. Weak 11%
5. Very Weak 0%
How strong do you think producing positive case studies comparing financial benefits of FLOSS budget reductions is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 38%
2. Strong 42%
3. Moderate 15%
4. Weak 4%
5. Very Weak 0%
How strong do you think the BCS promoting FLOSS is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 15%
2. Strong 23%
3. Moderate 23%
4. Weak 27%
5. Very Weak 12%
How strong do you think maximising the positive implications of data storage in FLOSS formats is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 16%
2. Strong 48%
3. Moderate 24%
4. Weak 4%
5. Very Weak 8%
How strong do you think lack of understanding of cost of ownership of FLOSS is a barrier for our scenario
1. Very Strong 15%
2. Strong 50%
3. Moderate 27%
4. Weak 4%
5. Very Weak 4%
How strong do you think a FLOSS 'killer application' is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 31%
2. Strong 54%
3. Moderate 12%
4. Weak 4%
5. Very Weak 0%
How strong do you think having no incubator for FLOSS is a barrier for our scenario
1. Very Strong 15%
2. Strong 50%
3. Moderate 19%
4. Weak 8%
5. Very Weak 8%
How strong do you think “creating an environment of freedom to experience” FLOSS is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 32%
2. Strong 28%
3. Moderate 24%
4. Weak 12%
5. Very Weak 4%
How strong do you think lack of existing market exploitation by FLOSS is a barrier for our scenario
1. Very Strong 19%
2. Strong 42%
3. Moderate 31%
4. Weak 8%
5. Very Weak 0%
How strong do you think sharing of learning and knowledge about FLOSS s a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 38%
2. Strong 42%
3. Moderate 12%
4. Weak 4%
5. Very Weak 4%
How strong do you think ignorance of Microsoft backdoors is a barrier for our scenario
1. Very Strong 12%
2. Strong 28%
3. Moderate 32%
4. Weak 16%
5. Very Weak 12%
How strong do you think threat of licence violation is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 12%
2. Strong 38%
3. Moderate 19%
4. Weak 27%
5. Very Weak 4%
How strong do you think IPR and copyright issues are a barrier for our scenario
1. Very Strong 8%
2. Strong 28%
3. Moderate 32%
4. Weak 20%
5. Very Weak 12%
How strong do you think promoting FLOSS best practice case studies are a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 36%
2. Strong 32%
3. Moderate 28%
4. Weak 0%
5. Very Weak 4%
How strong do you think publicising concerns about security is a driver for our scenario
1. Very Strong 8%
2. Strong 27%
3. Moderate 38%
4. Weak 19%
5. Very Weak 8%
Executive Summary >>>
Contents>>>
Status of this report >>>
Technical aspects, copyright and licensing; GNU Free Documentation License >>>
Copyright (c) 2004 IMIA Open Source Working Group and British Computer Society Health Informatics Committee
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and
no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
|
For general
enquiries about the Open Steps meeting, email: |
Site
development by: Peter Murray |
|
|
Design checked in: Mozilla 1.3.1, Opera 6.03, and other browsers Page maintained with: OpenOffice.org 1.1 |